Original message
| Al Jordan
  | "We're stuck on this one..." , Mon 2 Oct 14:38 
Spoke with a couple yesterday about this house and we're a little stuck... They've refinanced (ugh!) and payments are $2100 combined. They owe $189K House appraised at $180K They're behind $1,050 (refin. payment).
They will be letting the house go into forclosure and won't be making any more payments. They are now moved into an apartment where they "plan to stay for the next year, save up another down payment, and start over."
So, if I take the deed I've got nothing to lose. I wouldn't record it until I had found a buyer, which I figure would take about 3 mo., and make up the $7,400 in back payments ($2,100/mo *3= $6,300 + $1,100 = $7,400 Total).
Three months later I sell the house 10% above market for $198K, L/P, with $9,900 (~5%) option consideration and a $2,500 lease payment. (Leaving $400 PCF)
Wheew. If you're still with me after all that let me hear what you're thinking.
I can't lose, but do I want to try? Al 
Also, if we should do this what's the best way: subject to, contract for deed, or L/P? "...because we want to qualify in a year for sure." They understand that any way we structure it they will be taking a chance at not being able to qualify. I explained the whole "every bank is different" thing.
I've always been a little hazy on how to structure it when the seller would like to qualify later. Can anyone whipe the haze from my eyes?
"When rejection loses its emotional charge you can function at your best" -Azriela Jaffe
'If you lose $2 million on a deal you have a problem. If you lose $20 million on a deal the bank has a problem.'
| | Replies:
| |
|
|